<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon&#8217;s Kindle And Law Books &#8211; Soon The MPEP?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentabilityblog.com/2009/07/10/amazons-kindle-and-law-books-soon-the-mpep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentabilityblog.com/2009/07/10/amazons-kindle-and-law-books-soon-the-mpep/</link>
	<description>a weblog for the intellectual property law community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://www.patentabilityblog.com/2009/07/10/amazons-kindle-and-law-books-soon-the-mpep/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Fletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentabilityblog.com/?p=514#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Great info.  Thanks for contributing to this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info.  Thanks for contributing to this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave!</title>
		<link>http://www.patentabilityblog.com/2009/07/10/amazons-kindle-and-law-books-soon-the-mpep/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentabilityblog.com/?p=514#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Best practice: don&#039;t. At least, not yet.

I bought a Kindle 2, for personal and professional use. As a personal (fiction, some non-fiction) reader, I think it&#039;s awesome. I love it. I read more and I buy more books. 

As a &quot;professional&quot; reader, it&#039;s got a long way to go. The footnote as &quot;links&quot; feature is great for pieces where you really don&#039;t care about the references, but when you do (as I do in much legal reading) toggling back and forth is a royal pain and slows reading *way* down. I&#039;d rather just have them at the bottom of the page, thank you.

It&#039;s also slow for page turning and &quot;flipping&quot; (another thing I frequently do when reading for work) is dreadful. You cannot easily and *quickly* flip back to another section like you can with a thumb stuck between pages.

Also, for docs which are not already available for the Kindle (think cases, filings, etc.) lack of PDF support on the Kindle 2 is a major shortcoming. I have had good luck converting docs with MobiCreator, but it&#039;s not perfect by any means. Note: The Kindle DX has native PDF support, but I don&#039;t have one, so I can&#039;t speak to that.

Finally, the price break for legal books is kind of a joke, unless the experience is greatly enhanced (which just hasn&#039;t been the case for me--yet). I buy more Kindle fiction because it&#039;s quick, it&#039;s easy, and the reading experience is pretty solid. I would be really reluctant to drop $200+ on a legal title that is going to be a pain-in-the-rear to read. Frankly, for what they cost, I think they should just give you a Kindle version free if you buy the print edition. Otherwise, they would need to provide a steeper discount than 20% to make up for the pain of reading a professional doc on the Kindle. Just my $.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best practice: don&#8217;t. At least, not yet.</p>
<p>I bought a Kindle 2, for personal and professional use. As a personal (fiction, some non-fiction) reader, I think it&#8217;s awesome. I love it. I read more and I buy more books. </p>
<p>As a &#8220;professional&#8221; reader, it&#8217;s got a long way to go. The footnote as &#8220;links&#8221; feature is great for pieces where you really don&#8217;t care about the references, but when you do (as I do in much legal reading) toggling back and forth is a royal pain and slows reading *way* down. I&#8217;d rather just have them at the bottom of the page, thank you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also slow for page turning and &#8220;flipping&#8221; (another thing I frequently do when reading for work) is dreadful. You cannot easily and *quickly* flip back to another section like you can with a thumb stuck between pages.</p>
<p>Also, for docs which are not already available for the Kindle (think cases, filings, etc.) lack of PDF support on the Kindle 2 is a major shortcoming. I have had good luck converting docs with MobiCreator, but it&#8217;s not perfect by any means. Note: The Kindle DX has native PDF support, but I don&#8217;t have one, so I can&#8217;t speak to that.</p>
<p>Finally, the price break for legal books is kind of a joke, unless the experience is greatly enhanced (which just hasn&#8217;t been the case for me&#8211;yet). I buy more Kindle fiction because it&#8217;s quick, it&#8217;s easy, and the reading experience is pretty solid. I would be really reluctant to drop $200+ on a legal title that is going to be a pain-in-the-rear to read. Frankly, for what they cost, I think they should just give you a Kindle version free if you buy the print edition. Otherwise, they would need to provide a steeper discount than 20% to make up for the pain of reading a professional doc on the Kindle. Just my $.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
