June 1, 2009
The case is a challenge to an en banc ruling last October by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that a process for predicting and hedging risk in commodities markets did not deserve a patent, because it was not tied to a machine, and did not result in a physical transformation.
The In [...]
Read the full article →
April 17, 2009
I attended a recent BNA audioconference on patent prosecution and post-grant considerations in view of Bilski. The conference offered the insights of practitioners Kenneth N. Nigon of RatnerPrestia, Valley Forge, Pa., and Stephen C. Durant of Duane Morris, San Francisco, on drafting claims and seeking to reissue patents put in doubt by the Federal Circuit’s Bilski decision. [...]
Read the full article →